The Future of Biblical Interpretation: Responsible Plurality in Biblical Hermeneutics eds. Stanley E. Porter and Matthew R. Malcolm (IVP Academic, 2013)
I received a complimentary copy for review from IVP Academic.
I’ve already blogged about this book several times (here, here, and here) but I wanted to offer a general overview for those interested.
The Future of Biblical Interpretation arose out of a conference at the University of Nottingham in honor of the contributions of Anthony Thiselton. The book is comprised of eight chapters and an introduction/conclusion written by the editors. The focus of the book is answering the question, “How can readers of the Bible appropriately acknowledge and do justice to plurality, while being responsible as readers?’ (8)
The book is most accessible to those with some familiarity with Anthony Thiselton’s previous works but Thiselton’s opening chapter provides a good entry point into the discussion. Porter and Malcolm also provide a nice overview in their Conclusion (if you are unfamiliar I would suggest start with these two chapters before reading the rest of the book).
Each chapter of the book looks at the plurality in scripture from a different point of view.
- The Future of Biblical Interpretation and Responsible Plurality in Hermeneutics -Anthony Thiselton
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Theological Responsibility – Stanley Porter
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Scriptural Responsibility – Richard Brigss
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Kerygmatic Responsibility – Matthew Malcom
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Historical Responsibility – James Dunn
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Critical Responsibility – Robert Morgan
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Relational Responsiblity – Tom Greggs
- Biblical Hermeneutics and Ecclesial Responsibility – R. Walter Moberly
If you are interested in Biblical Hermeneutics this is a wonderful read. And if you are interested in Theological Interpretation of Scripture I would definitely suggest you read it because you will find several arguments for and concerns with theological interpretation.